Grantor

Recipient

Displaying 1 - 10 of 117
RRR:
Council/ruling decisions/legislation
384
year: 1140
initiator: Pope Innocent II
recipient: Patriarch William of Jerusalem
text: Dec. 17 1139 or Jan. 17 1140. Lateran. Pope Innocent II rebukes Patriarch William of Jerusalem for trying to prevent Fulcherus Tyrensis archiepiscopus receiving the pallium and for refusing to carry out the pope’s mandate that judgement should be made with respect to Haifa [Caypha seu Porphyria] within 3 months. William should respect the honour and dignity of Fulcherius and render him justice within 40 days. Otherwise the pope will withdraw William’s suffragans from their obedience to him. Dec. 17 1139 or Jan. 17 1140. Lateran. Pope Innocent II rebukes Patriarch William of Jerusalem for trying to prevent Fulcherus Tyrensis archiepiscopus receiving the pallium and for refusing to carry out the pope’s mandate that judgement should be made with respect to Haifa [Caypha seu Porphyria]... more
sources: Hiestand, PK, pp. 152-3, no. 40 (RRH no. 187)
cite:
RRR:
Council/ruling decisions/legislation
385
year: 1140
initiator: Pope Innocent II
recipient: Balduinus Berytensis episcopus, Bernardus Sydoniensis episcopus and Joannes Ptolomaidensis episcopus
text: Dec. 17 1139 or Jan. 17 1140. Lateran. Pope Innocent II rebukes Balduinus Berythensis episcopus, Bernardus Sydoniensis episcopus and Joannes Ptolomaidensis episcopus for refusing to subject themselves to Fulcherius Tyrensis archiepiscopus. He makes clear that if they obey him he will quash any action the patriarch of Jerusalem would take against them. Dec. 17 1139 or Jan. 17 1140. Lateran. Pope Innocent II rebukes Balduinus Berythensis episcopus, Bernardus Sydoniensis episcopus and Joannes Ptolomaidensis episcopus for refusing to subject themselves to Fulcherius Tyrensis archiepiscopus. He makes clear that if they obey him he will quash any... more
sources: Hiestand, PK, pp.153-4, no. 41 (RRH no. 186)
cite:
RRR:
Council/ruling decisions/legislation
386
year: 1140
initiator: Pope Innocent II
recipient: Ralph patriarch of Antioch
text: Dec. 17 1139 or Jan. 17 1140. Lateran. Pope Innocent II forbids Ralph [of Domfront], patriarch of Antioch, to prevent the suffragans of the province of Tyre showing due obedience and reverence to Fulcherius Tyrensis archiepiscopus. Dec. 17 1139 or Jan. 17 1140. Lateran. Pope Innocent II forbids Ralph [of Domfront], patriarch of Antioch, to prevent the suffragans of the province of Tyre showing due obedience and reverence to Fulcherius Tyrensis archiepiscopus.
sources: Hiestand, PK, pp. 154-5, no. 42 (RRH no. 185)
cite:
RRR:
Council/ruling decisions/legislation
Restoration of possessions/rights
387
year: 1140
initiator: Pope Innocent II
recipient: Gerardus Tripolitanus episcopus, Raimundus Tortosanus episcopus and Hugo Biblitanus episcopus
text: Dec. 17 1139 or Jan. 17 1140. Lateran. Pope Innocent II writes to Gerardus Tripolitanus episcopus, R[aimundus] Tortosanus episcopus and H[ugo] Biblitanus episcopus. Restoring their dioceses to the province of Tyre and absolving them from subjection to the patriarchate of Antioch, he orders them to show due obedience and reverence to Fulcherius Tyrensis archiepiscopus. Dec. 17 1139 or Jan. 17 1140. Lateran. Pope Innocent II writes to Gerardus Tripolitanus episcopus, R[aimundus] Tortosanus episcopus and H[ugo] Biblitanus episcopus. Restoring their dioceses to the province of Tyre and absolving them from subjection to the patriarchate of Antioch, he orders them to... more
sources: Hiestand, PK, pp.155-6, no. 43 (RRH no. 184)
cite:
RRR:
Grant
388
year: 1140
initiator: Robert de Loges
recipient: Hospital of Saint John of Jerusalem
institution: Hospital of Saint John of Jerusalem
text: *Mar. 12. On the advice of Princess Alice of Antioch and of his wife Hodierne, Robert de Loges gives [the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem] a gastina called Horari, with a church. *Mar. 12. On the advice of Princess Alice of Antioch and of his wife Hodierne, Robert de Loges gives [the Hospital of St John of Jerusalem] a gastina called Horari, with a church.
sources: Delaville Le Roulx, Cart Hosp 1:109, no. 133 (RRH no. 193a)
cite:
RRR:
Agreement/treaty
389
year: 1140
initiator: Damascus
recipient: Franks
text: *Spring. Formal alliance, ‘signed’ with oaths, between Damascus and the Franks in opposition to Zengi of Mosul. *Spring. Formal alliance, ‘signed’ with oaths, between Damascus and the Franks in opposition to Zengi of Mosul.
sources: Ibn al-Qalanisi, pp. 259-60
cite:
RRR:
Agreement/treaty
Exchange
Restoration of possessions/rights
390
year: 1140
initiator: Petrus prior Dominici Sepulcri
recipient: Raymond of Poitiers, prince of Antioch
institution: Holy Sepulchre
text: Feb. 1 – Apr. 19. Antioch. Petrus prior Dominici Sepulcri records that, together with some of his canons, he travelled from Jerusalem to Antioch to investigate the rights enjoyed by the church of the Holy Sepulchre in the time of the Greeks [Greci] and then under the Turks [Turci]. He found 2 mills, one standing, the other ruined, on the banks of the River Orontes at the head of the bridge leading to the Gate of the Count [of the city], which the Holy Sepulchre had once owned by hereditary right. Having investigated the matter with lord Raymond [of Poitiers], princeps ejusdem civitatis, and husband of Constantia and having taken evidence from elderly Suriani, it was agreed to put the 2 water wheels [duas rotas a parte fluminis] at [one of] these mills, called Funeidec, into the custody of three Suriani called Nicheforus, Michaelis and Nicholas for them and their heirs to hold in feodo villaniᶒ on condition that they meet the expenses in materials required in rebuilding the mill and the barrage [exclusa] for the mill race. In return they will have half of all the profit they make from milling and from fishing, although the division of produce between them and the Holy Sepulchre will only take place in the presence of the canons’ famulus, who will hold the key to the mills. If the mill should be damaged the Syrians will rebuild it; on a third refusal to rebuild the mill will be confiscated. If a miller is convicted of theft he will repay either in marcibans or in besants. If he cannot repay the money will be expropriated by a canon or by the canons’ famulus. The villania cannot be sold or pledged without the permission of the chapter of the Holy Sepulchre. Witnesses: Wlgrinus prepositus Sancti Sepulcri; Aimericus canonicus; Roberts canonicus; Nicholas canonicus; Gamaliel canonicus; Garnerius canonicus; Ansgerius /Angerius abbas [de] Sancto Georgio; Benedictus cantor; Guido canonicus Sancti Georgii; Silvester canonicus; Joscerandus capellanus; Theodorus notarius. Feb. 1 – Apr. 19. Antioch. Petrus prior Dominici Sepulcri records that, together with some of his canons, he travelled from Jerusalem to Antioch to investigate the rights enjoyed by the church of the Holy Sepulchre in the time of the Greeks [Greci] and then under the Turks [Turci]. He found 2... more
sources: Bresc-Bautier, Cart St-Sépulcre, pp. 183-5, no. 78 (RRH no. 199)
cite:
RRR:
Dispute/arbitration
391
year: 1140
initiator: Raymond of Poitiers, prince of Antioch
recipient: Canons of the Holy Sepulchre
institution: Holy Sepulchre
text: Apr. 19. Antioch. Raymond [of Poitiers], Dei nutu princeps Antiochenus, records how in the third year of his principate [1139] he made a pilgrimage to Jerusalem. While visiting the Holy Sepulchre, he was informed by Patriarch William, by Petrus Dominici Sepulcri prior, and by the whole community there of injuries long suffered by the church of the Holy Sepulchre in Antioch. They asked for the restoration of their rights. Raymond promised justice in his curia. On his return from Jerusalem, the prior of the Holy Sepulchre, accompanied by Wlgrinus prepositus and some brothers, came to Antioch on 1 February [1140] and accused the community of the abbey of St Paul of depriving the Holy Sepulchre of a garden and some land a long time ago. The complaint was put to Robertus cenobii Sancti Pauli abbas and his community, who unanimously declared that this was a case for the patriarch of Antioch, since it was an ecclesiastical, not a secular one, particularly as the garden had been exchanged by Patriarch Bernard for a house belonging to Stephanus thesaurarius ęcclesię Sancti Pauli. The abbey had in its possession a charter of exchange, confirmed by Prince Bohemond II. The authenticity of the document was questioned when it was presented. It was decided that the case could be held in the prince’s curia. The court was summoned for 30 March at Pons Ferri, outside Antioch, where Raymond was encamped [in castris] and again on 2 April in the prince’s palatium in Antioch. The canons of the Holy Sepulchre were present, but the monks of St Paul were not. Raymond took advice from his barones and reconvened the court for 13 April. On that occasion Guiterius de Mozo and Ricardus de Belmont, standing among the barones, solemnly summoned the abbot and monks of St Paul. Since they refused to appear before the court and plead, the canons of the Holy Sepulchre, whose case had been proved by the evidence of elderly Greek [Greci] witnesses called Gregorius ᶒcclesiᶒ Sanctᶒ Mariᶒ cantor, Thomas subcantor, Michael filius Molkim/Molkem and Abraham filius Sucar, were invested with the disputed property on 15 April. The ruling is confirmed by Prince Raymond and his wife Constantia principissa. Witnesses: Gaudinus Mamistanus archiepiscopus; Hugo Gabulensis episcopus; Aymericus decanus Antiochiᶒ; Willelmus Brachetus capellanus palatii; Aimericus capellanus palatii; Willelmus Pictaviensis capellanus palatii; Willelmus Petri clericus; Petrus canonicus Templi; Godefridus canonicus Sancti Abrahe; Drogo miles Templi; Goisbertus miles Templi; Rogerius de Montibus constabularius; Galterius de Surdavalle; Garento de Saone; Fulco de Boino; Willelmus Fraisnelli; Leo Maiopolus dux Antiochiᶒ; Gaufridus de Guirchia; Petrus de Armoini castellanus; Guiterius de Mozo; Ricardus de Belmunt; Robertus filius Gaufridi; Paganus de Fai; Garnerius de Burgo; Hugo de Boleira; Abo de Molins; Chalo de Masiaco/Masiago; Basilius camerarius; Oliverius frater ejus; Garinus Malmuz marescalcus; Raimundus marescalcus; Godefridus vicecomes; Theodorus notarius; Georgius, magister secretᶒ. The charter was drawn up by Odo cancellarius. Apr. 19. Antioch. Raymond [of Poitiers], Dei nutu princeps Antiochenus, records how in the third year of his principate [1139] he made a pilgrimage to Jerusalem. While visiting the Holy Sepulchre, he was informed by Patriarch William, by Petrus Dominici Sepulcri prior, and by the whole community... more
sources: Bresc-Bautier, Cart St-Sépulcre, pp. 178-83, no. 77 (RRH no. 194)
cite:
RRR:
Confirmation/renewal of grants
392
year: 1140
initiator: Raymond of Poitiers, prince of Antioch and his wife Constantia
recipient: Church of the Holy Sepulchre
institution: Holy Sepulchre
text: Apr. 19. Antioch. Raymond, Dei favente clementia princeps Antiochenus [elsewhere princeps invictissimus], and his wife Constantia confirm under seal all those properties that have been recently restored to the possession of the church of the Holy Sepulchre. Outside the city walls they are: 2 mills to the west of the Gate of the Bridge [porta Pontis], of which one is a building and is called in Arabic Funeidic and the other has lain in ruins for a long time; and a vineyard once owned by Bruno platearius. Within the walls they are: an apotheca situated before the Bath House that is called Omar in Arabic; a deserted house, anciently called of Berutus and situated before the church of St Menna; a house, called Serice, which is next to the church of St Peter; a house situated in front of the house Serice, which was once possessed by a Greek [Grecus] canon of the Holy Sepulchre called Salomon; all the houses, situated in front of the hospital [hospitale] called Hebeneboleit, which extend from the oven of Sanctus Georgius Discoopertus to the road that runs to the church of SS Cosmas and Damian. Prince Raymond adds more recent gifts to this list: a house given in alms by Osmundus canonicus Antiochenus, situated before the Bath House of Tancred; the house of Gameliel presbiter, Sancti Sepulcri canonicus, situated near the church of St Leonard; a house that belonged to a layman called Benedictus, facing the church of St Symeon. Witnesses: Gaudinus Mamistanus archiepiscopus; Hugo Gabulensis episcopus; Aimericus decanus Antiochiᶒ; Willelmus Brachetus capellanus palatii; Aimericus capellanus palatii; Willelmus Pictaviensis capellanus palatii; Willelmus Petri clericus; Petrus canonicus Templi; Godefridus canonicus Sancti Abrahe; Drogo miles Templi; Goisbertus miles Templi; Rogerius de Montibus constabularius; Galterus de Surdavalle; Garento de Saone; Fulco de Buignun/Buigiun; Willelmus Fraisnelli; Leo Majopolus dux Antiochiᶒ; Gaufridus de Guirchia; Petrus Armoini castellanus; Guiterius de Moceon; Ricardus de Belmunt; Robertus filius Gaufridi; Paganus de Fai; Garnerius de Burgo; Hugo de Boleira; Abo de Molins/Bolins; Cheale de Mausiaco; Basilius camerarius; Oliverius frater ejus; Garinus Malmuz marescalcus; Godefridus filius Raembaldi vicecomes; Raimundus marescalcus; Theodorus notarius; Georgius magister secretae. The charter was drawn up by Odo cancellarius. Apr. 19. Antioch. Raymond, Dei favente clementia princeps Antiochenus [elsewhere princeps invictissimus], and his wife Constantia confirm under seal all those properties that have been recently restored to the possession of the church of the Holy Sepulchre. Outside the city walls they are: 2 mills... more
sources: Bresc-Bautier, Cart St-Sépulcre, pp. 176-8, no. 76 (RRH no. 195)
cite:
RRR:
Confirmation/renewal of grants
393
year: 1140
initiator: Pope Innocent II
recipient: Abbey of Saint Mary of the Valley of Jehoshaphat
institution: Saint Mary of the Valley of Jehoshaphat
text: May 18. Lateran. In response to a request from Guido abbas of St Mary of the Valley of Jehoshaphat, Pope Innocent II confirms the abbey’s possessions in Sicily and southern Italy, together with its tithes and burial privileges and its right to admit confratres. May 18. Lateran. In response to a request from Guido abbas of St Mary of the Valley of Jehoshaphat, Pope Innocent II confirms the abbey’s possessions in Sicily and southern Italy, together with its tithes and burial privileges and its right to admit confratres.
sources: Hiestand, PK, pp.156-9, no. 44 (RRH no. 196)
cite:

Pages

  The Society for the Study of the Crusades and the Latin East (SSCLE)      isf     gif    

stamp